While so far three companies have asked the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to terminate them as respondents in Canon’s Section 337 investigation into toner cartridges and components that allegedly infringe Canon’s U.S. patents 5,903,803 and 6,128,454, only one did so jointly with Canon. (For our complete coverage of Canon’s lawsuit over allegedly infringing gear used in drums and all-in-one toner cartridges for Canon and HP laser printers, see the tag 337-TA-829.)
To see the rest of this post, please view membership options or login at the top of the page.
Tags: 337-TA-829, Canon, Canon v. Atman (2012), Canon v. OnlinetechStores.com (2012), exclusion order, featured, ITC investigations, non-OEM cartridges