Static Control v. Lexmark Stayed Pending Decision in Lexmark v. Impression Products

0

About two months ago, we published an update on Static Control’s false-advertising lawsuit against Lexmark in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (see “Static Control Pursues Lexmark for False Advertising and Costs”). This is what remains of the long-running litigation between the two adversaries, which stretches back over a dozen years

To see the rest of this post, please view membership options or log in to your account below.

Share.

Privacy Preference Center

Necessary

Cookies that are necessary for the site to function properly.

PHPSESSID, slidedeck-flash-message-flash, slidedeck-flash-message-flash_error, wfwaf-authcookie, wordpress_test_cookie, wp-settings, wp-settings-time, __cfduid

Analytics

These are used to track user interaction and detect potential problems. These help us improve our services by providing analytical data on how users use this site.

_ga, _gat, _gid, 1P_JAR, APISID, HSID, NID, OGP, OGPC, SAPISID, SID, SIDCC, SSID

error: Alert: Content is protected !!