While Epson’s patent-infringement complaint against Ninestar before the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon made far more headlines,…
Browsing: 337-TA-565
Earlier this month, we reported that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had decided to reexamine Epson’s U.S. patent…
Back in November, we learned that Epson and Ninestar had jointly asked the U.S. International trade Commission (ITC) to stay…
On September 15 and 16, Judge Anna J. Brown held summary judgment hearings in Epson’s patent-infringement lawsuit against Ninestar before…
We know what some of you may be thinking: “What? Epson and Ninestar are still arguing before the ITC? Wasn’t…
Epson’s and Ninestar’s legal battle is being waged on many fronts: the International Trade Commission (ITC), the U.S. Court of…
Epson and Ninestar’s legal battle over compatible ink tanks continues to rage on several fronts as it heads to trial…
A March 30 seizure and forfeiture order from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) indicates that Lake Oswego, OR-based Nano…
On March 18, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an order in investigation number 337-TA-565. The ITC will look…
In researching a recent article on Ninestar’s appeal of an $11.1 million fine ordered by the U.S. International Trade Commission…