Lexmark v. Impression Products: Apparent Change of Attorney for Supreme Court Appeal and News from District Court Level

0

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in the Lexmark v. Impression Products case in mid-February. Lexmark emerged the big winner, as the Federal Circuit decided to uphold two of its prior decisions related to patent exhaustion: Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Commission (2001) and Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart,

To see the rest of this post, please view membership options or log in to your account below.

Share.

Privacy Preference Center

Necessary

Cookies that are necessary for the site to function properly.

PHPSESSID, slidedeck-flash-message-flash, slidedeck-flash-message-flash_error, wfwaf-authcookie, wordpress_test_cookie, wp-settings, wp-settings-time, __cfduid

Analytics

These are used to track user interaction and detect potential problems. These help us improve our services by providing analytical data on how users use this site.

_ga, _gat, _gid, 1P_JAR, APISID, HSID, NID, OGP, OGPC, SAPISID, SID, SIDCC, SSID

error: Alert: Content is protected !!